The Corruption of FBI Special Agent Jayson Chambers
The Corruption of FBI Special Agent Jayson Chambers
FBI agent in Michigan "Whitmer Kidnapping" plot appears to have used FBI funds for his own private company Exeintel
January 4, 2023 - What do you do if it turns out that one of the lead FBI special agents in charge of an investigation that appears to have been an entrapment scheme used FBI resources to fund his own private company while he was still working for the FBI?
What if it also turns out that the investigation into a “plot,” to kidnap far left Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer was a fraud and was used to further political agendas and career advancement of the FBI agents involved? What if one of those agents was seeking to profit off the case? Wouldn’t that be considered a conflict of interest, or at least something the jury should be privy to?
The FBI special agent in charge of the Detroit Field Office at the time, Steven D’Antuono who oversaw the investigation was promoted and transferred to the lead FBI Field Office in Washington, DC. He was in charge of the DC Field Office during January 6, and he also oversaw the raid of former President Donald Trump at Mar-A-Lago last year. He has since “retired,” from the FBI right as Republican officials have talked about investigating the FBI’s actions.
Trial testimony and evidence produced via discovery in the Whitmer plot has proven that the FBI “instigated, encouraged and facilitated” the “plot” to kidnap Whitmer. Moreover, numerous agents involved have been accused of misconduct or criminal behavior.
FBI special agent Henrik Impola has been accused of perjury in numerous cases, including ones that involved the use of FBI informants. FBI special agent Richard Trask was arrested for violently and brutally assaulting his own wife following a “swingers party,” in Kalamazoo.
FBI special agent Jayson Chambers is accused of using the case to promote his own private company Exeintel. Chambers was discussing his plans to retire and move into the private sector while he was working on the Whitmer case. He said to other agents in text messages that he needed a “big case,” to transition his career. He was the agent who insisted he was going to run the investigation as a TEI, regardless of whether he got approval from his FBI superiors or not.
Numerous politicians have discussed the case, and pointed out the FBI’s apparent misconduct:
FBI Director Christopher Wray was asked about the case by Senator Ted Cruz last year. Cruz asked if any of the agents had been reprimanded for their actions, and Wray declined to answer.
It appears that FBI special agent Jayson Chambers not only engaged in misconduct and unethical behavior, but he may have broken the law. Entrapment is illegal but it goes deeper than that. It appears Chambers was using FBI resources and funds to pay the salary of a women who was “working daily” to help him launch his private intelligence firm. It looks like he was paying her with FBI funds as a “CHS” or confidential human source, aka FBI informant, for her work for Exeintel. At the time, Exeintel hadn’t made any money so he didn’t have a way to compensate her for her work.
The following documents appear to show Chambers breaking the law and misusing taxpayer dollars in the form of FBI resources that he chose to “reallocate,” to make his transition from the FBI to the private sector “relatively painless.”
We need to know if the prosecutor Mr. Nils Kessler ever investigated FBI special agent Jayson Chambers for the potential criminal violation outlined in the letter.
Here we see an email from Jayson Chambers to a colleague where he discusses his daily planning and work to prepare Exeintel to go “live.” He appears to admit to reallocating FBI resources to his own private, for-profit company. He mentions the woman “Sheli,” who he appears to have been paying with FBI funds for her work for his company.
Here is a flyer for Exeintel.
Here is a second flyer for Exeintel.
Chambers appears to have attempted to conceal his connection to the company while the Whitmer trial was underway. The defense was able to subpoena information about a Twitter account associated with Exeintel, but the Judge declined to let the jury hear about it.
In fact, the jury was not permitted to hear about any of the misconduct of the 3 lead FBI agents in the case and the government did not call them to testify at trial. Instead they brought in agents from other offices. Another lead informant in the case, career criminal Stephen Robeson wasn’t compelled to testify about his role in the case, which allowed the government to conceal his role in the entrapment. Robeson was allowed to plead the fifth at both trials, with the judge declining to compel his testimony.
Why are FBI agents seemingly allowed to break the law with impunity? Why do U.S. Attorney’s like Mr. Nils Kessler have sole discretion to investigate them or not. Why are they allowed to make that determination? If you or I broke the law, you can be sure that we would be arrested and prosecuted.
Mr. Nils Kessler needs to explain what his office chose to do with this information about Jayson Chambers. Did they investigate him, if not why? Has he been disciplined by the FBI? If not, why?
It is my belief that the 3 lead agents involved in this case should all be investigated and charged criminally for the entrapment fraud.
The picture above is the Logo for Exeintel, the company owned by Jayson Chambers.
Jayson Chambers is pictured above, the image coming from his LinkedIn page.
For more information on Jayson Chambers and Exeintel, see the following Buzzfeed articles:
Excellent article, Christina. Once I saw behind the veil years ago it made me lose all trust in the government. Thank you for your determination to expose this horrible activity by the FBI.